Tuesday, April 28, 2009

ADVANCES IN NON-DESTRUCTIVE INSPECTION AND EVALUATION OF WELDS


1.0 INTRODUCTION
Welding is widely used in the fabrication of nearly all industrial components. Despite the best care taken during design, fabrication and inspection, many of the welded components fail especially at the weld and heat affected zones, drastically influencing the performance reliability and component availability. Majority of the failures are attributed to improper design of weld joint, selection of base materials and filler materials, welding processes, residual stresses, inspection procedures and operating parameters. One way to minimise the failures of welded components is to impart non destructive testing (NDT) procedures i) immediately after the fabrication to make sure the welded joint is defect-free and ii) during the service life of welded components to ensure that no unacceptable defects are present and grow [1]. Variety of NDT techniques exits and nearly every form of energy is used in NDT field to device methods for detection and evaluation of nearly all kinds of defects, be they surface or internal. While a few basic NDT methods such as penetrant, ultrasonic, radiography, visual testing are sufficient and routinely employed for the inspection of welds, use of advanced NDT techniques is resorted to when high sensitivity detection and quantitative characterisation of harmful defects is envisaged.
Often, signal and image processing methods are adopted to meet these objectives. While NDT data on defect dimensions helps fracture mechanics to assess the health of a welded component, it is fracture mechanics based analysis that acts as a driving force for developments in the science and technology of NDT by putting straight demand to detect very small defects as and when they are formed in the component
[2]. In this paper, after a brief review of conventional NDT methods, advances made in the field of x-radiography, eddy current and ultrasonic methods are discussed. Also use of acoustic emission and infrared thermography methods for on-line monitoring and control of welding processes and for integrity assessment of welded pressure vessels are discussed. The techniques used for evaluation of residual stresses in welded components are also covered.
2.0 CONVENTIONAL NDT TECHNIQUESNo weld is completely perfect. Despite the best care taken during design, fabrication and inspection, many of the welded components fail especially at the weld and heat affected zones due to cracks, residual stresses and variations in microstructure and mechanical properties, all of which are often grouped together and referred to as discontinuities or simply defects, if harmful. Weld defects can be classified broadly as cracks (crater, transverse, toe, under bead, fusion line and root cracks), cavities, porosities, slag inclusions, incomplete fusion or penetration, poor fusion, under cut, excessive reinforcement, imperfect shape or unacceptable contour, spatter, arc strikes etc. Cracks are considered more harmful and they are usually classified as longitudinal or transverse or toe or crater cracks depending on their orientation. Also based on the temperature of formation, they are termed as hot cracks or cold cracks. Porosity and slag inclusion are also harmful defects and they are caused by entrapment of gases and oxides and non-metallic solids in the weld metal during the solidification.A variety of NDT techniques are available for detection and characterisation of defects in welds. All NDT techniques are based on physical principles. Nearly every form of energy is used as probing medium in NDT. Likewise nearly every property of the materials to be inspected has been made the basis for some method or technique of NDT. In general, NDT methods involve subjecting the material (being examined) to some form of external energy source (X-rays, ultrasonic, thermal wave, electromagnetic fields etc.) and analysing the detected response signals (refracted energy, induced voltage and diffracted energy).
The essential parts of any NDT method are 1) application of a probing or inspection medium, 2) modification of the probing or inspection medium by defects or variations in the structure or properties of the material, 3) detection of this change by suitable detector or sensor, 4) conversion of this change into a suitable signal or image and 5) interpretation of the information obtained [2]. For example, in the case of X-ray film radiography of welds, 1) the X-rays are the probing or inspecting medium, 2) any defects in the weld being radiographed modify the intensity of the radiation reaching the film on the opposite side of the weld, 3) certain silver bromide emulsions are sensitive to X-rays and are used as a detector, 4) the emulsions are capable of recording variations in X-ray intensity and by proper developing, a permanent record is made, and 5) interpretation is then a process of explaining variations in density of the radiograph. Some of the widely used NDT techniques for the examination of welded structures include; visual, liquid penetrant, leak, magnetic particle, ultrasonic, eddy current, Gamma and X radiography, acoustic emission, potential drop, infrared thermography etc. As NDT measurements are indirect, artificial standard defects are used to set the instruments, sensors and test procedures for a desired performance. Further, since NDT operator decides the success of an inspection method, experienced or certified skilled personnel are specified for interpretation of NDT results.

3.0 ADVANCES IN NDT TECHNIQUES
3.1VISUAL TECHNIQUESVisual techniques play an important role in quick assessment of the quality of welds and to identify various defects like undercut, lake of penetration etc. The basic design of the borescopes, which has been in use for many decades for visual examination, has been modified accommodating the state-of-the-art advances in video, illumination, robotic, optical and computer technologies. Developments in image processing, artificial intelligence, video technology and other related fields have significantly improved the capability of visual techniques [3]. Present day demand for higher performance and faster production exceed the abilities of visual tests by humans. Consequently, visual tests made by human eye are being replaced by automated visual testing using optical instruments and unstaffed inspection stations. Such aspects are usually referred to as machine vision. Geometrical imperfections such as improper weld ripples, convexity and concavity need to be detected in inaccessible regions. Replica technique is ideal for such applications. In this technique, the profile of a defect region is replicated using silicon rubber compound and the dimensions of the defect region are measured using profile projector which can achieve an accuracy of + 5 microns. The hardware for the replica technique essentially consists of manual injection device, mixing guns, silicone rubber compound, injection head, spring loaded CRS plugs and recovery cork screw head. Replica technique has been adopted for examination of a number of joints in the reheater of Prototype Fast Breeder Reactor (PFBR). Similarly, for measuring concavity and convexity of weld joints videoimagescope is preferred. It is an advanced version of the flexible fiberscope in which a CCD chip is used for imaging. Compared to fiberscopes, videoimagescopes provide high resolution and brighter images. With the introduction of advanced image management functions and measurement capabilities, accurate measurements of internal profiles of tube are possible. A variety of viewing tips with varying field of view are available which can be used depending on the nature and type of application. Similarly, images can be suitably enhanced through image processing functions such as contrast stretching and edge enhancement. Using the 3-D graphic measurement system, it is possible to measure the length, width etc. on the images very accurately. Commercially available Olympus videoimagescope model IVC-6 has been used for measuring concavity and convexity of a number of joints of Reheaters of PFBR [4].
3.2 RADIOGRAPHYAs the X-ray absorption coefficient depends strongly on material density, radiography is particularly effective at detecting volumetric defects, which contain either extra mass or missing mass (such as slag inclusions or porosity). The benchmark for radiographic inspection of welds is still high-quality film radiography and good radiographic practice is now enshrined by a series of national standards, covering factors such as choice of voltage, film–source distances, intensifiers, image quality indicators, film density, film processing, etc. There have been a number of advances in radiography over the past 10–15 years including more reliable microfocus tubes, real-time radiography and the application of image processing techniques to sharpen the image and to increase the contrast. For better definition of defects and delectability of small defects like micro-cracks in thin components and complex geometries, high resolution micro-focal X radiography has an edge over the conventional radiography. One of the important applications of micro-focal radiography is evaluation of tube to tube sheet weld joints of PFBR steam generators (made by welding between pull out of tube sheet and the tube).The most significant recent development in radiography has been the real-time radiography. Real time radiography or fluoroscopy differs from conventional radiography in that the X ray image is observed on a fluorescent screen rather than recorded on a film. Fluoroscopy has the advantages of high speed and low cost of inspection. Present day real time systems use image intensifiers, video camera and monitor. The principal advantages of real-time radiography are that it is well suited to automation and the images of the component under inspection are available directly without time delays due to film exposure and processing. Furthermore, as the images are provided in digital form, image processing and automatic defect interpretation softwares can be readily incorporated into the inspection system. On-line monitoring of welding is another possibility by real time radiography. Direct examination of the welds in real time saves films and time and is found to be cost effective in the long run [5]. The use of microfocal units in conjunction with image intensifying system greatly enhances the versatility and sensitivity of the real time radiography, by way of zooming or projection magnification. With the advent of image processing systems, the sensitivity that can be achieved is comparable to film sensitivity. The stored or digitized X-ray image can be subjected to image processing and enhancement techniques such as contrast stretching, edge enhancement, special filtering, differentiation, averaging, and pattern recognition for enhanced detection of defects and also for obtaining quantitative information. The versatility of image processing is that this can be performed in real time as well as on film images. Figures 1(a) and 1(b) show typical radiograph of a weld joint. Figure 1(a) gives the raw image wherein penetrameter wires are not clearly seen. After contrast stretching and image enhancement (Fig. 1(b)), the lack of penetration can be seen and the wire penetrameters can be identified thereby increasing the sensitivity.
3.3 ULTRASONICSUltrasonics is now the major NDT technique used for validation of welded structures in many pre-service as well as in-service applications. Ultrasonics is a preferred technique over X-radiography in in-service inspections is due to inherent limitations in radiography and to actual benefits in applying ultrasonics. Ultrasonic waves are scattered by both planar and volumetric defects, making the ultrasonic technique useful for detecting and sizing both types of defects. Even closed cracks are detectable by ultrasonics if appropriate procedures are used. Unlike radiography, ultrasonics also readily gives depth information concerning a defect. Ultrasonics also offers benefits over radiography in terms of cost savings through increased productivity and safety. In the last few decades, ultrasonics has developed from a purely manual technique, to a manual technique with computer-assisted processing, to the use of automatic scanners and more recently to the development of fully automated systems incorporating multiple piezoelectric transducers for weld assessment. Studies clearly establish the fact that the probability of detecting a defect with ultrasonics increases with the degree of sophistication of the system. Ultrasonic methods are also widely used for measurement of residual stresses and also for characterisation of microstructures [6]. For these studies, ultrasonic velocity is preferred to attenuation measurements.The use of ultrasonics to establish the integrity of welded structures requires not only reliable defect detection but also sufficiently accurate defect location and sizing using amplitude dependent techniques (e.g. 20 dB drop, 6 dB drop, or comparison with the amplitude expected from a drilled hole). However, these techniques are known to be inaccurate. The incorporation of computer-assisted processing into ultrasonic systems has allowed the easy implementation of potentially better methods for defect detection and sizing such as time-of-flight-diffraction (TOFD). TOFD has the ability to capture high-resolution, low amplitude signals and perform real time processing to carry out crack tip diffraction examination (Fig.2) [7]. It lends itself ideally to fast volumetric detection applications where inspection results need to be of sufficient quality to enable decisive on line action. This speed is achieved by virtue of the fact that a wide beam, tandem array of transducers and scanned parallel to the weld, are usually sufficient to achieve full coverage and scan rates upto 50mm/s without the need for comprehensive raster scanning and probe skewing. There are also efforts to develop multi probe system (instead of two probe system) capable of inspecting the given weld region of the pressure vessel as well as building a prototype nozzle scanner based on the same technique. The multiprobe system is capable of detecting and locating defects in the given weld region throughout the full depth of the pressure vessel and to a width of t/L on either side of the weld region. It uses sixteen probes controlled by a computer with automated data acquisition and processing. It is intended to size defects within ± 2mm and size all defects greater than 5mm in depth below the interface between the stainless steel cladding and the carbon steel plate.Important advances in defect sizing for weld inspection have also been made possible by the incorporation in automated ultrasonic systems of ultrasonics imaging based on synthetic aperture focussing (SAFT) and variants such as SUPERSAFT. When the transducer is located directly above a defect, the time delay to receive the defect echo is minimal. As the transducer moves away from this position, the time delay increases in a non-linear fashion. The curve defined by tracing the peak amplitude (in each aperture element) as the transducer moves parallel to the surface is a function of the speed of the sound in the material and the geometry of the transducer and the target. The first synthetic aperture processing step is to choose a collection of aperture elements to be processed as a unit, herein after referred as the ‘aperture’. The essence of SAFT processing is to introduce a time shift to each individual A-scans which varies with time delay introduced by the test system geometry, to sum these individual aperture elements point by point across their length, and then to place the result at the center of the chosen aperture. Reflections coming from defect are constructively added and other signals such as grain noise and electronic noise are destructively summed, resulting in good signal to noise ratio for the defect [8]. When scanning is done in one direction (X), we get only two dimensional amplitude distribution corresponding to the area below the scanned line and perpendicular to the scanned surface thus performing a side view (B Scan). The microstructures of austenitic welds cause special concerns for ultrasonic testing. These materials strongly attenuate ultrasonic waves, cause high background noise due to scattering from the large grains present, and result in skewing of the ultrasonic beam unless the propagation is along principal axes. Considerable progress has already been made on detailed modelling of wave propagation in austenitic materials and on using neural networks for defect recognition and automated decision making. Various options exist for the improved generation and detection of ultrasound in welding applications, e.g. by the use of phased arrays, laser techniques and other specialist probes. Increasingly, electromagnetic transducers (EMATs) are finding application in the non-contact generation of horizontally polarised shear waves which have a number of advantages in weld testing. Phased array angle beam EMAT systems capable of exciting narrow band, obliquely propagating bulk waves with controlled direction and focusing are available [7]. The phased array EMATs provide a greater flexibility in both the selection of wave modes and angles of propagation. Experimental investigations were carried out using the SH waves generated by EMATs for defect sizing by TOFD method. Two 8-segmented EMATs were designed for their use as transmitter and receiver in pitch-catch mode. Test and instrument parameters were optimised for high sensitive detection of diffracted signals. Besides signal averaging, cross-correlation and analytical signal processing using Hilbert transform were adopted to enhance SNR and to improve accuracy in the transit time measurements and in turn the defect sizing. Experimental studies were carried out on fatigue cracks and machined notches in carbon steel and stainless steel specimens. Typical rf signal from a 28 mm deep fatigue crack in 56 mm thick carbon steel sample is shown in Fig.3. The back wall and diffracted echoes are clearly seen. The beam entry point was determined by the back-wall echo arrival time and analytic signal method was implemented for precise transit time measurements. From the transit time measurements, using distance between EMATs and angle of insonificaiton, defect depths were calculated and a correlation coefficient of 0.99 was observed between actual and calculated defect depths. EMATs are particularly attractive for high temperature and radioactive components and also for components with limited access, primarily due to the fact that EMATs do not need couplant to transfer ultrasonic energy. Two major limitations in using EMATs for a number of practical applications are the physical size of the source of magnetic field (a few tens of millimeters) and the low transduction efficiency (due to weak Lorenz and magnetostrictive driving forces) as compared to piezoelectric transducers.
3.4 EDDY CURRENT TESTINGConventional eddy current (EC) testing of welds is affected by surface roughness, microstructural variations, delta-ferrite, lift-off, edge-effect etc. Presence of these disturbing variables significantly influences the defect detection as well as sizing. In order to realize quick detection and accurate on-line depth evaluation of defects in the presence of such disturbing variables, an artificial neural network (ANN) based approach has been developed. This uses a three-layer feed forward error back-propagation type network with one hidden layer and one output node that gives the defect depth in user defined units. In this method, the digitized real and imaginary components of EC probe impedance are given as input to an optimized neural network. The network output is evaluated and displayed continuously. The performance of the network has been evaluated on stainless steel plates and welds for detection and depth evaluation of surface-breaking machined notches in the presence of disturbing variables. Systematic optimization studies have revealed that a 12-5-1 architecture is optimum and can detect weld defects as small as 0.4 mm deep with an accuracy of +0.04 mm (Fig. 4) A network trained with holes and notches has detected with 100 % success both notches and holes. However, for accurate depth evaluation, it has been necessary to use separate networks [9]. The on-line ANN approach has been successfully applied to thin walled stainless steel tubes with periodic wall thickness variations for detection and accurate quantification of depth of defects.Defects, which are described as three-dimensional functions of the space co-ordinates, cannot be completely reconstructed by scanning an eddy current probe coil over a defect in one direction and even by using sophisticated signal processing methods. On the other hand, a definite benefit exists if raster-scan imaging is made and the results are presented in the form of a gray level or pseudo color image. Eddy current imaging (ECI) is a recently emerging trend in the field of eddy current imaging. There are many advantages that follow the image format. It is rather comfortable to interpret the images of defects, as compared to the dynamic impedance display. Another advantage of the image format lies in the ability of the human eye and brain to readily discern irregularities in an image by comparing different regions. Further, the processed image and the defect details provide an objective and documentable information that could, e.g. be used to monitor the growth of defects with time. More important, process automation is possible because computers perform raster-scan imaging as well as data/image processing. An ECI system has been built around a PC at the author’s laboratory to scan the object surface and create impedance grey level images (Fig. 5). Eddy current images of welds, notches, corrosion pits and cracks in austenitic stainless steels have been obtained using the ECI system. The precise location of the weld centre line, in the inner vessel of PFBR, is required as feedback information for remote operation of robots for detailed inspection of the welds by ultrasonic techniques. ECI method has been developed to precisely locate the weld centre line. Figure 6 shows the 3-D profile image of the weldment. Due to predominant variations in the electrical conductivity and magnetic permeability (due to the presence of delta ferrite) of the weld metal, this region is distinctly brought out. The changes in the material properties affect the probe impedance. The change in the impedance varies from the base metal - weld interface to the weld - base metal interface and reaches a peak at the centre of the weld. This peak is clearly observed in the 3-D profile (Fig. 6). Thus the precise location of the weld centre line is found from this profile by measuring the distance along Y-axis from the origin i.e. starting point of the scanning. The accuracy of detection of the weld centre line is found to be + 0.1 mm. ECI also has been performed on welds for detection and sizing of defects in welds. However, three major problems have been noticed. They are 1) blurring of images as probe diameter is large, 2) noisy images due to the influence of disturbing variables and 3) time intensiveness. In order to realize fast and automated detection and enhanced characterization of surface defects in austenetic stainless steels, an intelligent imaging scheme has been developed by synergistically combining neural network and image processing methods [10]. This scheme involves:The imaging scheme has been validated on austenetic stainless steel plates and welds consisting of machined defects as well as natural defects. The imaging scheme has been successfully applied to welds for automatic detection and evaluation of longitudinal as well transverse notches. It has been observed that the scheme has been able to reliably detect all the defects present in the imaged regions and evaluate their length, width, depth and orientation, suppressing the dominance of welds variations and presence of magnetic delta-ferrite have not degraded the performance of the scheme (Fig. 7). Defects deeper than 0.4 mm have been detected and characterized with a ten-fold reduction in imaging time. Further, the scheme has clearly brought down the computer memory requirements for storage of image data, due to the fact that only the image data of fine-scan imaging regions has been stored.
3.5 ACOUSTIC EMISSION TECHNIQUEAcoustic Emission Technique (AET) is an important NDT technique. Its origination lies in the phenomenon of rapid release of energy within a component in the form of a transient elastic wave resulting from dynamic changes like deformation, crack initiation and propagation, leakage etc. It is a real time technique which can detect initiation and growth of cracks, plastic deformation, fatigue failure, leaks etc. AET is used during hydrotesting of as-fabricated welded vessels and also in service during their hydrotesting. AET is also used for on-line inspection of welded vessels and pipe lines for monitoring their structural integrity. In addition to this, of late AET is being considered for on line weld monitoring during fabrication for simultaneous detection of defects as the welding progresses [11]. The defects so found can be immediately rectified thus avoiding the completion of defective weld, saving time and money. AET has been successfully used for on line monitoring of welds prepared by TIG, submerged arc, electroslag welding etc. However, non slag forming welding methods are most suitable for AE monitoring. The defects that can be detected, located and quantitatively evaluated by AE monitoring during welding are: (1) Weld cracking associated with phase transformation, (2) Nucleation and growth of cracks during welding and subsequent cooling e.g., delayed cracking, (3) Porosity and slag inclusions, (4) Microfissuring, (5) Hot and cold cracking and (6) Reheat cracks. Once weld defects are located, they are further probed using other NDT techniques for in-depth analysis.AE technique has been used for on-line monitoring during resistance spot welding. Figure 8 shows the typical pattern of AE signals generated during resistant spot welding. By judicious analysis of the signals generated during different periods of the welding cycle, it has been possible to identify good and bad wleds and also the shear strength of the nugget can be estimated using AE parameters. The AE generated can be related to the weld quality parameters such as strength and size of the nugget, the amount of expulsion and the amount of cracking. Therefore, in-process AE monitoring can be used both as an examination method and also as a means for providing feedback control.
3.6 ALTERNATING CURRENT POTNETIAL DROP TECHNIQUESUltrasonic and alternating current potential drop (ACPD) methods are the only two established NDT techniques used for measuring crack depth in welds. Unlike ultrasonic inspection, which is used for both detection and sizing, ACPD is used almost exclusively for crack sizing. The ACPD method is only applicable to surface breaking cracks and requires electrical contact with the specimen. The surface current introduced into the specimen by the ACPD technique induces a magnetic field in free space above the specimen surface. Mapping of the perturbation of this magnetic field provides an alternative means of measuring crack depth and crack length without the requirement for a contacting probe. This technique is also termed as alternating magnetic field measurement (ACFM). ACFM offers the capability of both detection and sizing of surface breaking defects without the need for calibration and without the requirement for cleaning to the base metal. This technique is finding increasing application, particularly in weld inspection in offshore platforms.
3.7 INFRARED THERMOGRAPHY (IRT) TECHNIQUEMeasurements for this NDE technique are derived from changes in thermal resistance that arise in the flow of heat through the components. These changes can be detected by infrered cameras that are sensitive to surface temperature differences of less than 0.1 degrees Celsius. Precisely, IRT let one "see" heat [1, 2]. It is non-contact and fairly simple and it offers speed and high resolution plus the advantage of full-field imaging. IRT is also capable of providing very detailed images of situations invisible to the naked eye. By taking a thermograph of site electrical panels, thermographers develop and read a "heat picture" which reveals components that are overloaded or may become faulty. Unlike normal component operating conditions, faulty components exhibit readily detectable temperature increases over the ambient temperature profile. IRT verifies that electrical connections are properly made and maintained. IRT also detects hot spots that might be overlooked by visual inspections. IRT can be used to characterize defects in welds and voids in materials such as gaps in adhesive layers or air bubbles as these they have a much higher thermal resistance than the surrounding material. IRT has been used for the on-line monitoring of weld pools as part of intelligent processing of materials.3.8 X-RAY DIFFRACTION (XRD) TECHNIQUE FOR RESIDUAL STRESSESResidual stresses are introduced in industrial components during welding process and also during the service life of the welded component due to loading conditions. For example, the stresses are introduced during welding process due to nonuniform heat distribution taking place during the welding process. Several destructive and nondestructive techniques are presently available for the residual stress measurements. Destructive techniques cannot be applied on finished components and are time consuming and uneconomical. Therefore NDT techniques are preferred for residual stress measurements [12]. Some of these techniques include: (i) Ultrasonic (ii) X Ray Diffraction (XRD), (iii) Acoustic Barkhausen Noise (ABN) and (IV) Magnetic Barkhausen Noise (MBN). Additionally, semi destructive hole drilling strain gauge technique is also employed for measurement of residual stresses. Ultrasonic technique of evaluating residual stresses is based on the measurement of changes in the velocity of ultrasonic waves due to stress and by establishing the acousto-elastic constant. Several methods using ultrasonic waves of various types such as longitudinal, transverse and surface waves have been tried with varying degree of success for weldments. MBN and ABN techniques are based on Barkhausen effect and applicable only to ferromagnetic metals and alloys. Barkhausen effect takes place when a magnetic field is swept in the material along a hysteresis loop. MBN is due to irreversible change in magnetic domain movements during hysteresis and ABN is due to elastic deformation associated with magnetic domain rotation during irreversible changes in magnetization. MBN signals can be acquired by sensor coil or by Hall type probe and ABN signals are acquired by piezoelectric transducers. Both MBN and ABN signals are strong functions of stress condition and hence stresses can be assessed by analysing the MBN and ABN signals. XRD technique measures the change in the interplanar spacing of the lattice in the presence of stresses in a material. It is well known that peak intensity of diffracted X ray beam occurs when Bragg's law is satisfied. In the presence of elastic macro-stresses, there is shift in the diffraction peak positions. The magnitude of the shift gives a measure of the stress and the direction of the shift depends on the nature of the stresses i.e. whether they are tensile or compressive. XRD technique has been used to measure the residual stresses before and after post weld heat treatment (PWHT), in autogenous butt weld joints in 2.25 Cr-1 Mo steel tubes. The tubes are used in the steam generator assemblies of PFBR. Hot liquid sodium flows in the shell region (outside the tubes) and water inside the tubes. A leak in the tube will lead to the generation of hydrogen due to the reaction of sodium with water with dangerous consequences. Tube-to-tube sheet weld joints are the weakest regions where a leakage path can be formed with relative ease. Apart from the requirement in the quality control procedures that the weld joints should be free from unacceptable defects that may lead to leak paths, it is also considered essential to use a NDT technique to assess the residual stress (RS) pattern and to evaluate the PWHT to be used for removing the residual stresses whose presence, otherwise, may lead to the failure of the tube to tube sheet weld joint. The equipment used for the measurement of the residual stresses is a portable X-ray stress analyzer (Rigaku Strainflex MSF) and Sin2? multiplex method was used for the stress measurements. Figure 9 shows the residual stress variations across are of the weld joints prepared with pre heat. The variations on both the outside surface and the inside surface are shown. The tensile stress maximum occurs at the weld center line both on the outside and the inside surface. On the inside surface, the zero crossing of RS from tensile to compressive occurs about 2 cm away from the weld center line, as compared to 1cm on the outside surface. The maximum compressive stress level on the inside surface is also much higher than that on the outside surface. The asymmetry in the variation of RS both on the outside and the inside surfaces is attributed to the restraint offered by the tube sheet block on one side where the compressive stresses were found to be higher. Variation of stress distribution at different depths below the top surface is also shown in Fig. 9. These measurements were done after removing 50 to 150 micron layers on the outside surface. Surface removal was done by electropolishing only at the point of measurement so as to avoid any stress relaxation due to layer removal. It is seen that, within a depth of only 150 microns, the stresses approach zero values. This shows that the RS is restricted only to a thin layer at the top [13]. With the help of portable equipments, it is also possible to apply the technique on large objects and carry out the measurements in field and quickly. It can be used for quantitative analysis of macro and micro residual stresses separately.
4.0 SUMMARYIn this paper, advances in NDT techniques for inspection of welds for detection and quantitative characterisation of defects, residual stresses and microstructural variations are highlighted. Since the probing medium and the interactions are different, capabilities and limitations of various NDT techniques for defect detection and evaluation differ. Hence, selection of NDT technique for a specific inspection application is very important. To site an example, for detection of fatigue cracks in stainless steel welds, it is not surprising that eddy current and liquid penetrant testing are superior to ultrasonic testing and radiography. At the same time, the later techniques are capable of reliably detecting deep-seated volumetric defects, which go undetected by the former techniques. Prior to selection of an NDT technique, it is essential to obtain information about the location and type of defects such as nature, probable size and orientation using chemical composition, material properties, microstructure, fabrication procedure, operating environment and history details. Sensitivity, detectability, accessibility, speed and past experience play a major role in the selection of a technique for a specific application. It may sometimes be necessary to use a combination of two or more techniques, in the best complementary way, to carry out NDT testing in a reliable manner. For such situations, detailed mock up studies are essential prior to actual inspection to optimise instrument parameters, design and selection of sensors, calibration defects, and to prepare procedures for recording and evaluation of test data, to ultimately arrive at the desired sensitivity and reliability. The summary of applicability and capability of various NDT techniques for assessment of defects in welded components is given in Table.1 as a guide to choose an appropriate technique. Continuous developments are taking place in NDT techniques with concurrent advances in micro-electronics, computers, optics, materials and sensors. Today NDT is matured enough to take up nearly all kinds of challenging jobs in welded structures as regards to quick detection and sizing of harmful defects, almost as and when they form or before they grow to critical sizes causing catastrophic failure of components.

ADVANCES IN NON-DESTRUCTIVE INSPECTION AND EVALUATION OF WELDS


1.0 INTRODUCTION
Welding is widely used in the fabrication of nearly all industrial components. Despite the best care taken during design, fabrication and inspection, many of the welded components fail especially at the weld and heat affected zones, drastically influencing the performance reliability and component availability. Majority of the failures are attributed to improper design of weld joint, selection of base materials and filler materials, welding processes, residual stresses, inspection procedures and operating parameters. One way to minimise the failures of welded components is to impart non destructive testing (NDT) procedures i) immediately after the fabrication to make sure the welded joint is defect-free and ii) during the service life of welded components to ensure that no unacceptable defects are present and grow [1]. Variety of NDT techniques exits and nearly every form of energy is used in NDT field to device methods for detection and evaluation of nearly all kinds of defects, be they surface or internal. While a few basic NDT methods such as penetrant, ultrasonic, radiography, visual testing are sufficient and routinely employed for the inspection of welds, use of advanced NDT techniques is resorted to when high sensitivity detection and quantitative characterisation of harmful defects is envisaged.
Often, signal and image processing methods are adopted to meet these objectives. While NDT data on defect dimensions helps fracture mechanics to assess the health of a welded component, it is fracture mechanics based analysis that acts as a driving force for developments in the science and technology of NDT by putting straight demand to detect very small defects as and when they are formed in the component
[2]. In this paper, after a brief review of conventional NDT methods, advances made in the field of x-radiography, eddy current and ultrasonic methods are discussed. Also use of acoustic emission and infrared thermography methods for on-line monitoring and control of welding processes and for integrity assessment of welded pressure vessels are discussed. The techniques used for evaluation of residual stresses in welded components are also covered.
2.0 CONVENTIONAL NDT TECHNIQUESNo weld is completely perfect. Despite the best care taken during design, fabrication and inspection, many of the welded components fail especially at the weld and heat affected zones due to cracks, residual stresses and variations in microstructure and mechanical properties, all of which are often grouped together and referred to as discontinuities or simply defects, if harmful. Weld defects can be classified broadly as cracks (crater, transverse, toe, under bead, fusion line and root cracks), cavities, porosities, slag inclusions, incomplete fusion or penetration, poor fusion, under cut, excessive reinforcement, imperfect shape or unacceptable contour, spatter, arc strikes etc. Cracks are considered more harmful and they are usually classified as longitudinal or transverse or toe or crater cracks depending on their orientation. Also based on the temperature of formation, they are termed as hot cracks or cold cracks. Porosity and slag inclusion are also harmful defects and they are caused by entrapment of gases and oxides and non-metallic solids in the weld metal during the solidification.A variety of NDT techniques are available for detection and characterisation of defects in welds. All NDT techniques are based on physical principles. Nearly every form of energy is used as probing medium in NDT. Likewise nearly every property of the materials to be inspected has been made the basis for some method or technique of NDT. In general, NDT methods involve subjecting the material (being examined) to some form of external energy source (X-rays, ultrasonic, thermal wave, electromagnetic fields etc.) and analysing the detected response signals (refracted energy, induced voltage and diffracted energy).
The essential parts of any NDT method are 1) application of a probing or inspection medium, 2) modification of the probing or inspection medium by defects or variations in the structure or properties of the material, 3) detection of this change by suitable detector or sensor, 4) conversion of this change into a suitable signal or image and 5) interpretation of the information obtained [2]. For example, in the case of X-ray film radiography of welds, 1) the X-rays are the probing or inspecting medium, 2) any defects in the weld being radiographed modify the intensity of the radiation reaching the film on the opposite side of the weld, 3) certain silver bromide emulsions are sensitive to X-rays and are used as a detector, 4) the emulsions are capable of recording variations in X-ray intensity and by proper developing, a permanent record is made, and 5) interpretation is then a process of explaining variations in density of the radiograph. Some of the widely used NDT techniques for the examination of welded structures include; visual, liquid penetrant, leak, magnetic particle, ultrasonic, eddy current, Gamma and X radiography, acoustic emission, potential drop, infrared thermography etc. As NDT measurements are indirect, artificial standard defects are used to set the instruments, sensors and test procedures for a desired performance. Further, since NDT operator decides the success of an inspection method, experienced or certified skilled personnel are specified for interpretation of NDT results.

3.0 ADVANCES IN NDT TECHNIQUES
3.1VISUAL TECHNIQUESVisual techniques play an important role in quick assessment of the quality of welds and to identify various defects like undercut, lake of penetration etc. The basic design of the borescopes, which has been in use for many decades for visual examination, has been modified accommodating the state-of-the-art advances in video, illumination, robotic, optical and computer technologies. Developments in image processing, artificial intelligence, video technology and other related fields have significantly improved the capability of visual techniques [3]. Present day demand for higher performance and faster production exceed the abilities of visual tests by humans. Consequently, visual tests made by human eye are being replaced by automated visual testing using optical instruments and unstaffed inspection stations. Such aspects are usually referred to as machine vision. Geometrical imperfections such as improper weld ripples, convexity and concavity need to be detected in inaccessible regions. Replica technique is ideal for such applications. In this technique, the profile of a defect region is replicated using silicon rubber compound and the dimensions of the defect region are measured using profile projector which can achieve an accuracy of + 5 microns. The hardware for the replica technique essentially consists of manual injection device, mixing guns, silicone rubber compound, injection head, spring loaded CRS plugs and recovery cork screw head. Replica technique has been adopted for examination of a number of joints in the reheater of Prototype Fast Breeder Reactor (PFBR). Similarly, for measuring concavity and convexity of weld joints videoimagescope is preferred. It is an advanced version of the flexible fiberscope in which a CCD chip is used for imaging. Compared to fiberscopes, videoimagescopes provide high resolution and brighter images. With the introduction of advanced image management functions and measurement capabilities, accurate measurements of internal profiles of tube are possible. A variety of viewing tips with varying field of view are available which can be used depending on the nature and type of application. Similarly, images can be suitably enhanced through image processing functions such as contrast stretching and edge enhancement. Using the 3-D graphic measurement system, it is possible to measure the length, width etc. on the images very accurately. Commercially available Olympus videoimagescope model IVC-6 has been used for measuring concavity and convexity of a number of joints of Reheaters of PFBR [4].
3.2 RADIOGRAPHYAs the X-ray absorption coefficient depends strongly on material density, radiography is particularly effective at detecting volumetric defects, which contain either extra mass or missing mass (such as slag inclusions or porosity). The benchmark for radiographic inspection of welds is still high-quality film radiography and good radiographic practice is now enshrined by a series of national standards, covering factors such as choice of voltage, film–source distances, intensifiers, image quality indicators, film density, film processing, etc. There have been a number of advances in radiography over the past 10–15 years including more reliable microfocus tubes, real-time radiography and the application of image processing techniques to sharpen the image and to increase the contrast. For better definition of defects and delectability of small defects like micro-cracks in thin components and complex geometries, high resolution micro-focal X radiography has an edge over the conventional radiography. One of the important applications of micro-focal radiography is evaluation of tube to tube sheet weld joints of PFBR steam generators (made by welding between pull out of tube sheet and the tube).The most significant recent development in radiography has been the real-time radiography. Real time radiography or fluoroscopy differs from conventional radiography in that the X ray image is observed on a fluorescent screen rather than recorded on a film. Fluoroscopy has the advantages of high speed and low cost of inspection. Present day real time systems use image intensifiers, video camera and monitor. The principal advantages of real-time radiography are that it is well suited to automation and the images of the component under inspection are available directly without time delays due to film exposure and processing. Furthermore, as the images are provided in digital form, image processing and automatic defect interpretation softwares can be readily incorporated into the inspection system. On-line monitoring of welding is another possibility by real time radiography. Direct examination of the welds in real time saves films and time and is found to be cost effective in the long run [5]. The use of microfocal units in conjunction with image intensifying system greatly enhances the versatility and sensitivity of the real time radiography, by way of zooming or projection magnification. With the advent of image processing systems, the sensitivity that can be achieved is comparable to film sensitivity. The stored or digitized X-ray image can be subjected to image processing and enhancement techniques such as contrast stretching, edge enhancement, special filtering, differentiation, averaging, and pattern recognition for enhanced detection of defects and also for obtaining quantitative information. The versatility of image processing is that this can be performed in real time as well as on film images. Figures 1(a) and 1(b) show typical radiograph of a weld joint. Figure 1(a) gives the raw image wherein penetrameter wires are not clearly seen. After contrast stretching and image enhancement (Fig. 1(b)), the lack of penetration can be seen and the wire penetrameters can be identified thereby increasing the sensitivity.
3.3 ULTRASONICSUltrasonics is now the major NDT technique used for validation of welded structures in many pre-service as well as in-service applications. Ultrasonics is a preferred technique over X-radiography in in-service inspections is due to inherent limitations in radiography and to actual benefits in applying ultrasonics. Ultrasonic waves are scattered by both planar and volumetric defects, making the ultrasonic technique useful for detecting and sizing both types of defects. Even closed cracks are detectable by ultrasonics if appropriate procedures are used. Unlike radiography, ultrasonics also readily gives depth information concerning a defect. Ultrasonics also offers benefits over radiography in terms of cost savings through increased productivity and safety. In the last few decades, ultrasonics has developed from a purely manual technique, to a manual technique with computer-assisted processing, to the use of automatic scanners and more recently to the development of fully automated systems incorporating multiple piezoelectric transducers for weld assessment. Studies clearly establish the fact that the probability of detecting a defect with ultrasonics increases with the degree of sophistication of the system. Ultrasonic methods are also widely used for measurement of residual stresses and also for characterisation of microstructures [6]. For these studies, ultrasonic velocity is preferred to attenuation measurements.The use of ultrasonics to establish the integrity of welded structures requires not only reliable defect detection but also sufficiently accurate defect location and sizing using amplitude dependent techniques (e.g. 20 dB drop, 6 dB drop, or comparison with the amplitude expected from a drilled hole). However, these techniques are known to be inaccurate. The incorporation of computer-assisted processing into ultrasonic systems has allowed the easy implementation of potentially better methods for defect detection and sizing such as time-of-flight-diffraction (TOFD). TOFD has the ability to capture high-resolution, low amplitude signals and perform real time processing to carry out crack tip diffraction examination (Fig.2) [7]. It lends itself ideally to fast volumetric detection applications where inspection results need to be of sufficient quality to enable decisive on line action. This speed is achieved by virtue of the fact that a wide beam, tandem array of transducers and scanned parallel to the weld, are usually sufficient to achieve full coverage and scan rates upto 50mm/s without the need for comprehensive raster scanning and probe skewing. There are also efforts to develop multi probe system (instead of two probe system) capable of inspecting the given weld region of the pressure vessel as well as building a prototype nozzle scanner based on the same technique. The multiprobe system is capable of detecting and locating defects in the given weld region throughout the full depth of the pressure vessel and to a width of t/L on either side of the weld region. It uses sixteen probes controlled by a computer with automated data acquisition and processing. It is intended to size defects within ± 2mm and size all defects greater than 5mm in depth below the interface between the stainless steel cladding and the carbon steel plate.Important advances in defect sizing for weld inspection have also been made possible by the incorporation in automated ultrasonic systems of ultrasonics imaging based on synthetic aperture focussing (SAFT) and variants such as SUPERSAFT. When the transducer is located directly above a defect, the time delay to receive the defect echo is minimal. As the transducer moves away from this position, the time delay increases in a non-linear fashion. The curve defined by tracing the peak amplitude (in each aperture element) as the transducer moves parallel to the surface is a function of the speed of the sound in the material and the geometry of the transducer and the target. The first synthetic aperture processing step is to choose a collection of aperture elements to be processed as a unit, herein after referred as the ‘aperture’. The essence of SAFT processing is to introduce a time shift to each individual A-scans which varies with time delay introduced by the test system geometry, to sum these individual aperture elements point by point across their length, and then to place the result at the center of the chosen aperture. Reflections coming from defect are constructively added and other signals such as grain noise and electronic noise are destructively summed, resulting in good signal to noise ratio for the defect [8]. When scanning is done in one direction (X), we get only two dimensional amplitude distribution corresponding to the area below the scanned line and perpendicular to the scanned surface thus performing a side view (B Scan). The microstructures of austenitic welds cause special concerns for ultrasonic testing. These materials strongly attenuate ultrasonic waves, cause high background noise due to scattering from the large grains present, and result in skewing of the ultrasonic beam unless the propagation is along principal axes. Considerable progress has already been made on detailed modelling of wave propagation in austenitic materials and on using neural networks for defect recognition and automated decision making. Various options exist for the improved generation and detection of ultrasound in welding applications, e.g. by the use of phased arrays, laser techniques and other specialist probes. Increasingly, electromagnetic transducers (EMATs) are finding application in the non-contact generation of horizontally polarised shear waves which have a number of advantages in weld testing. Phased array angle beam EMAT systems capable of exciting narrow band, obliquely propagating bulk waves with controlled direction and focusing are available [7]. The phased array EMATs provide a greater flexibility in both the selection of wave modes and angles of propagation. Experimental investigations were carried out using the SH waves generated by EMATs for defect sizing by TOFD method. Two 8-segmented EMATs were designed for their use as transmitter and receiver in pitch-catch mode. Test and instrument parameters were optimised for high sensitive detection of diffracted signals. Besides signal averaging, cross-correlation and analytical signal processing using Hilbert transform were adopted to enhance SNR and to improve accuracy in the transit time measurements and in turn the defect sizing. Experimental studies were carried out on fatigue cracks and machined notches in carbon steel and stainless steel specimens. Typical rf signal from a 28 mm deep fatigue crack in 56 mm thick carbon steel sample is shown in Fig.3. The back wall and diffracted echoes are clearly seen. The beam entry point was determined by the back-wall echo arrival time and analytic signal method was implemented for precise transit time measurements. From the transit time measurements, using distance between EMATs and angle of insonificaiton, defect depths were calculated and a correlation coefficient of 0.99 was observed between actual and calculated defect depths. EMATs are particularly attractive for high temperature and radioactive components and also for components with limited access, primarily due to the fact that EMATs do not need couplant to transfer ultrasonic energy. Two major limitations in using EMATs for a number of practical applications are the physical size of the source of magnetic field (a few tens of millimeters) and the low transduction efficiency (due to weak Lorenz and magnetostrictive driving forces) as compared to piezoelectric transducers.
3.4 EDDY CURRENT TESTINGConventional eddy current (EC) testing of welds is affected by surface roughness, microstructural variations, delta-ferrite, lift-off, edge-effect etc. Presence of these disturbing variables significantly influences the defect detection as well as sizing. In order to realize quick detection and accurate on-line depth evaluation of defects in the presence of such disturbing variables, an artificial neural network (ANN) based approach has been developed. This uses a three-layer feed forward error back-propagation type network with one hidden layer and one output node that gives the defect depth in user defined units. In this method, the digitized real and imaginary components of EC probe impedance are given as input to an optimized neural network. The network output is evaluated and displayed continuously. The performance of the network has been evaluated on stainless steel plates and welds for detection and depth evaluation of surface-breaking machined notches in the presence of disturbing variables. Systematic optimization studies have revealed that a 12-5-1 architecture is optimum and can detect weld defects as small as 0.4 mm deep with an accuracy of +0.04 mm (Fig. 4) A network trained with holes and notches has detected with 100 % success both notches and holes. However, for accurate depth evaluation, it has been necessary to use separate networks [9]. The on-line ANN approach has been successfully applied to thin walled stainless steel tubes with periodic wall thickness variations for detection and accurate quantification of depth of defects.Defects, which are described as three-dimensional functions of the space co-ordinates, cannot be completely reconstructed by scanning an eddy current probe coil over a defect in one direction and even by using sophisticated signal processing methods. On the other hand, a definite benefit exists if raster-scan imaging is made and the results are presented in the form of a gray level or pseudo color image. Eddy current imaging (ECI) is a recently emerging trend in the field of eddy current imaging. There are many advantages that follow the image format. It is rather comfortable to interpret the images of defects, as compared to the dynamic impedance display. Another advantage of the image format lies in the ability of the human eye and brain to readily discern irregularities in an image by comparing different regions. Further, the processed image and the defect details provide an objective and documentable information that could, e.g. be used to monitor the growth of defects with time. More important, process automation is possible because computers perform raster-scan imaging as well as data/image processing. An ECI system has been built around a PC at the author’s laboratory to scan the object surface and create impedance grey level images (Fig. 5). Eddy current images of welds, notches, corrosion pits and cracks in austenitic stainless steels have been obtained using the ECI system. The precise location of the weld centre line, in the inner vessel of PFBR, is required as feedback information for remote operation of robots for detailed inspection of the welds by ultrasonic techniques. ECI method has been developed to precisely locate the weld centre line. Figure 6 shows the 3-D profile image of the weldment. Due to predominant variations in the electrical conductivity and magnetic permeability (due to the presence of delta ferrite) of the weld metal, this region is distinctly brought out. The changes in the material properties affect the probe impedance. The change in the impedance varies from the base metal - weld interface to the weld - base metal interface and reaches a peak at the centre of the weld. This peak is clearly observed in the 3-D profile (Fig. 6). Thus the precise location of the weld centre line is found from this profile by measuring the distance along Y-axis from the origin i.e. starting point of the scanning. The accuracy of detection of the weld centre line is found to be + 0.1 mm. ECI also has been performed on welds for detection and sizing of defects in welds. However, three major problems have been noticed. They are 1) blurring of images as probe diameter is large, 2) noisy images due to the influence of disturbing variables and 3) time intensiveness. In order to realize fast and automated detection and enhanced characterization of surface defects in austenetic stainless steels, an intelligent imaging scheme has been developed by synergistically combining neural network and image processing methods [10]. This scheme involves:The imaging scheme has been validated on austenetic stainless steel plates and welds consisting of machined defects as well as natural defects. The imaging scheme has been successfully applied to welds for automatic detection and evaluation of longitudinal as well transverse notches. It has been observed that the scheme has been able to reliably detect all the defects present in the imaged regions and evaluate their length, width, depth and orientation, suppressing the dominance of welds variations and presence of magnetic delta-ferrite have not degraded the performance of the scheme (Fig. 7). Defects deeper than 0.4 mm have been detected and characterized with a ten-fold reduction in imaging time. Further, the scheme has clearly brought down the computer memory requirements for storage of image data, due to the fact that only the image data of fine-scan imaging regions has been stored.
3.5 ACOUSTIC EMISSION TECHNIQUEAcoustic Emission Technique (AET) is an important NDT technique. Its origination lies in the phenomenon of rapid release of energy within a component in the form of a transient elastic wave resulting from dynamic changes like deformation, crack initiation and propagation, leakage etc. It is a real time technique which can detect initiation and growth of cracks, plastic deformation, fatigue failure, leaks etc. AET is used during hydrotesting of as-fabricated welded vessels and also in service during their hydrotesting. AET is also used for on-line inspection of welded vessels and pipe lines for monitoring their structural integrity. In addition to this, of late AET is being considered for on line weld monitoring during fabrication for simultaneous detection of defects as the welding progresses [11]. The defects so found can be immediately rectified thus avoiding the completion of defective weld, saving time and money. AET has been successfully used for on line monitoring of welds prepared by TIG, submerged arc, electroslag welding etc. However, non slag forming welding methods are most suitable for AE monitoring. The defects that can be detected, located and quantitatively evaluated by AE monitoring during welding are: (1) Weld cracking associated with phase transformation, (2) Nucleation and growth of cracks during welding and subsequent cooling e.g., delayed cracking, (3) Porosity and slag inclusions, (4) Microfissuring, (5) Hot and cold cracking and (6) Reheat cracks. Once weld defects are located, they are further probed using other NDT techniques for in-depth analysis.AE technique has been used for on-line monitoring during resistance spot welding. Figure 8 shows the typical pattern of AE signals generated during resistant spot welding. By judicious analysis of the signals generated during different periods of the welding cycle, it has been possible to identify good and bad wleds and also the shear strength of the nugget can be estimated using AE parameters. The AE generated can be related to the weld quality parameters such as strength and size of the nugget, the amount of expulsion and the amount of cracking. Therefore, in-process AE monitoring can be used both as an examination method and also as a means for providing feedback control.
3.6 ALTERNATING CURRENT POTNETIAL DROP TECHNIQUESUltrasonic and alternating current potential drop (ACPD) methods are the only two established NDT techniques used for measuring crack depth in welds. Unlike ultrasonic inspection, which is used for both detection and sizing, ACPD is used almost exclusively for crack sizing. The ACPD method is only applicable to surface breaking cracks and requires electrical contact with the specimen. The surface current introduced into the specimen by the ACPD technique induces a magnetic field in free space above the specimen surface. Mapping of the perturbation of this magnetic field provides an alternative means of measuring crack depth and crack length without the requirement for a contacting probe. This technique is also termed as alternating magnetic field measurement (ACFM). ACFM offers the capability of both detection and sizing of surface breaking defects without the need for calibration and without the requirement for cleaning to the base metal. This technique is finding increasing application, particularly in weld inspection in offshore platforms.
3.7 INFRARED THERMOGRAPHY (IRT) TECHNIQUEMeasurements for this NDE technique are derived from changes in thermal resistance that arise in the flow of heat through the components. These changes can be detected by infrered cameras that are sensitive to surface temperature differences of less than 0.1 degrees Celsius. Precisely, IRT let one "see" heat [1, 2]. It is non-contact and fairly simple and it offers speed and high resolution plus the advantage of full-field imaging. IRT is also capable of providing very detailed images of situations invisible to the naked eye. By taking a thermograph of site electrical panels, thermographers develop and read a "heat picture" which reveals components that are overloaded or may become faulty. Unlike normal component operating conditions, faulty components exhibit readily detectable temperature increases over the ambient temperature profile. IRT verifies that electrical connections are properly made and maintained. IRT also detects hot spots that might be overlooked by visual inspections. IRT can be used to characterize defects in welds and voids in materials such as gaps in adhesive layers or air bubbles as these they have a much higher thermal resistance than the surrounding material. IRT has been used for the on-line monitoring of weld pools as part of intelligent processing of materials.3.8 X-RAY DIFFRACTION (XRD) TECHNIQUE FOR RESIDUAL STRESSESResidual stresses are introduced in industrial components during welding process and also during the service life of the welded component due to loading conditions. For example, the stresses are introduced during welding process due to nonuniform heat distribution taking place during the welding process. Several destructive and nondestructive techniques are presently available for the residual stress measurements. Destructive techniques cannot be applied on finished components and are time consuming and uneconomical. Therefore NDT techniques are preferred for residual stress measurements [12]. Some of these techniques include: (i) Ultrasonic (ii) X Ray Diffraction (XRD), (iii) Acoustic Barkhausen Noise (ABN) and (IV) Magnetic Barkhausen Noise (MBN). Additionally, semi destructive hole drilling strain gauge technique is also employed for measurement of residual stresses. Ultrasonic technique of evaluating residual stresses is based on the measurement of changes in the velocity of ultrasonic waves due to stress and by establishing the acousto-elastic constant. Several methods using ultrasonic waves of various types such as longitudinal, transverse and surface waves have been tried with varying degree of success for weldments. MBN and ABN techniques are based on Barkhausen effect and applicable only to ferromagnetic metals and alloys. Barkhausen effect takes place when a magnetic field is swept in the material along a hysteresis loop. MBN is due to irreversible change in magnetic domain movements during hysteresis and ABN is due to elastic deformation associated with magnetic domain rotation during irreversible changes in magnetization. MBN signals can be acquired by sensor coil or by Hall type probe and ABN signals are acquired by piezoelectric transducers. Both MBN and ABN signals are strong functions of stress condition and hence stresses can be assessed by analysing the MBN and ABN signals. XRD technique measures the change in the interplanar spacing of the lattice in the presence of stresses in a material. It is well known that peak intensity of diffracted X ray beam occurs when Bragg's law is satisfied. In the presence of elastic macro-stresses, there is shift in the diffraction peak positions. The magnitude of the shift gives a measure of the stress and the direction of the shift depends on the nature of the stresses i.e. whether they are tensile or compressive. XRD technique has been used to measure the residual stresses before and after post weld heat treatment (PWHT), in autogenous butt weld joints in 2.25 Cr-1 Mo steel tubes. The tubes are used in the steam generator assemblies of PFBR. Hot liquid sodium flows in the shell region (outside the tubes) and water inside the tubes. A leak in the tube will lead to the generation of hydrogen due to the reaction of sodium with water with dangerous consequences. Tube-to-tube sheet weld joints are the weakest regions where a leakage path can be formed with relative ease. Apart from the requirement in the quality control procedures that the weld joints should be free from unacceptable defects that may lead to leak paths, it is also considered essential to use a NDT technique to assess the residual stress (RS) pattern and to evaluate the PWHT to be used for removing the residual stresses whose presence, otherwise, may lead to the failure of the tube to tube sheet weld joint. The equipment used for the measurement of the residual stresses is a portable X-ray stress analyzer (Rigaku Strainflex MSF) and Sin2? multiplex method was used for the stress measurements. Figure 9 shows the residual stress variations across are of the weld joints prepared with pre heat. The variations on both the outside surface and the inside surface are shown. The tensile stress maximum occurs at the weld center line both on the outside and the inside surface. On the inside surface, the zero crossing of RS from tensile to compressive occurs about 2 cm away from the weld center line, as compared to 1cm on the outside surface. The maximum compressive stress level on the inside surface is also much higher than that on the outside surface. The asymmetry in the variation of RS both on the outside and the inside surfaces is attributed to the restraint offered by the tube sheet block on one side where the compressive stresses were found to be higher. Variation of stress distribution at different depths below the top surface is also shown in Fig. 9. These measurements were done after removing 50 to 150 micron layers on the outside surface. Surface removal was done by electropolishing only at the point of measurement so as to avoid any stress relaxation due to layer removal. It is seen that, within a depth of only 150 microns, the stresses approach zero values. This shows that the RS is restricted only to a thin layer at the top [13]. With the help of portable equipments, it is also possible to apply the technique on large objects and carry out the measurements in field and quickly. It can be used for quantitative analysis of macro and micro residual stresses separately.
4.0 SUMMARYIn this paper, advances in NDT techniques for inspection of welds for detection and quantitative characterisation of defects, residual stresses and microstructural variations are highlighted. Since the probing medium and the interactions are different, capabilities and limitations of various NDT techniques for defect detection and evaluation differ. Hence, selection of NDT technique for a specific inspection application is very important. To site an example, for detection of fatigue cracks in stainless steel welds, it is not surprising that eddy current and liquid penetrant testing are superior to ultrasonic testing and radiography. At the same time, the later techniques are capable of reliably detecting deep-seated volumetric defects, which go undetected by the former techniques. Prior to selection of an NDT technique, it is essential to obtain information about the location and type of defects such as nature, probable size and orientation using chemical composition, material properties, microstructure, fabrication procedure, operating environment and history details. Sensitivity, detectability, accessibility, speed and past experience play a major role in the selection of a technique for a specific application. It may sometimes be necessary to use a combination of two or more techniques, in the best complementary way, to carry out NDT testing in a reliable manner. For such situations, detailed mock up studies are essential prior to actual inspection to optimise instrument parameters, design and selection of sensors, calibration defects, and to prepare procedures for recording and evaluation of test data, to ultimately arrive at the desired sensitivity and reliability. The summary of applicability and capability of various NDT techniques for assessment of defects in welded components is given in Table.1 as a guide to choose an appropriate technique. Continuous developments are taking place in NDT techniques with concurrent advances in micro-electronics, computers, optics, materials and sensors. Today NDT is matured enough to take up nearly all kinds of challenging jobs in welded structures as regards to quick detection and sizing of harmful defects, almost as and when they form or before they grow to critical sizes causing catastrophic failure of components.

Eddy Current Non Destructive Testing




What is Eddy Current Testing?




Non-destructive testing (NDT) aims detection and characterisation of defects /flaws / discontinuities in a material without impairing the intended use of the material. Eddy Current Testing (ECT) is an electromagnetic NDT technique widely used in nuclear, aerospace, power, petrochemical and other industries to examine metallic plates, sheets, tubes, rods and bars etc. for detection and sizing of cracks, corrosion and other material discontinuities during manufacturing as well as in-service.This is not a volumetric (radiography and ultrasonic) technique. Like liquid penetrant and magnetic particle techniques, this is a surface technique and can readily detect very shallow surface defects (fatigue cracks, intergranular stress corrosion cracks etc.) and sub-surface defects (inclusions, voids etc.) within a depth of, say 6 mm. Eddy curent testing is a simple, high-speed, high-sensitive, versatile and reliable NDT technique and is popularly used in many engineering industries.






Theory and principle of eddy current testing, advantages, limitations, applications and standards are covered briefly in this page.Eddy Current Testing Introduction / Principles / Theory Eddy current testing works on the principles of electromagnetic induction (recall Maxwell's equations, electrical transformers, induction furnace, skin-effect, Ohm's law, Wheatstone bridge etc.). In eddy current (EC) technique, a coil (also called probe or sensor) is excited with sinusoidal alternating current (frequency, f, ~ 50 Hz-5 MHz) to induce what are called eddy currents (swrling or closed loops of currents that exist only in metallic materials) in an electrically conducting material such as stainless steel, aluminium etc. being tested. The change in coil impedance, Z that arises due to distortion of eddy currents at regions of discontinuities (defects, material property variations, surface characteristics etc,) and associated magnetic flux linkages, is measured and correlated with the cause producing it i.e. discontinuities. Eddy currents are a problem in electircal engineering systems such as transformers, as they cause severe heating losses. However, they are used to advantage in eddy current non-destructive testing. An eddy current coil can be considered to be having resistance and inductance in series in an AC circuit.






According to Ohm's law, the circuit impedance Z (Voltage/Current) is a vector quantity with resistance R and inductive reactance Xl as the real and imaginary components (Z = R + jXl).Briefly in eddy current testing, the following sequential things happen:* Eddy current coil generates primary magnetic field (Ampere's law)* Primary magnetic field induces eddy currents in the material (Faraday's law)* Eddy currents generate secondary magnetic field in the opposite direction (Lenz's law)* Coil impedance changes, as a result* Impedance change is measured, analyzed and correlated with defect dimensionsThe locus of impedance change formed during the movement of an eddy current probe coil over a test material having a defect is called an eddy current signal. The peak-to-peak amplitude of the eddy current signal provides information about the defect severity.






The phase angle of the eddy current signal with respect to a known reference (lift-off) provides information about the defect location or depth. Defects that cause maximum perturbation to eddy current flow produce large eddy current response (signal amplitude) and hence detected with high sensitivity (see distortion figure below). Similarly, defects that are parallel to eddy current flow may not produce a significant change in coil impedance and as a result they produce a weak reponse i.e. detected with poor sensitivity.



Governing Laws* Ampere's law* Faraday's law* Lenz's lawProperties of Eddy Currents* They are closed loops* They flow in a plane that is parallel to coil winding or material surface.* They attenuate and lag in phase with depthCoil ImpedanceZ = R + j Xl

Ultrasonic Non-destructive Testing

Ultrasonic Testing (UT)
It uses sound waves having frequencies usually in the mega hertzs range. Two basic methods in UT are pulse echo and through transmission. While the former method makes use of a single transducer, the later makes use of two. In the pulse echo method a transducer, made of piezoelectric material, transmits a pulse of mechanical energy into the material. The energy passes into the material, reflects from the back surface, and is detected by the same transducer, yielding a signal on an oscilloscope with a time base.
The oscilloscope normally shows the original pulse of the ultrasonic transducer (front surface echo), the back reflection and any extra blip indicating a reflection from a defect in the material. From the oscilloscope timing, the depth of the defect below the surface can be determined. Alternatively, in the transmission method, two transducers are placed on opposite sides of the material and any reduced intensity sensed by the receiving transducer indicates defect shadowing part of the ultrasonic energy. The location of defect can not be obtained. Both pulse echo reflection and transmission methods are in use and their selection depends on the accessibility of the component.UT can detect defects oriented both in the plane of and normal to the surface of components using normal beam or angle beam transducers.
By suitable design of ultrasonic transducer, ultrasonic beams can be introduced into a material at almost any angle. There are several forms of ultrasonic waves, the most widely used in NDT being compressional (longitudinal) and transverse (shear) waves. In a specific application of tube testing for detecting defects normal to the wall, the beam is converted to a shear wave which is propagated around the circumference or along the axis. In order to detect defects efficiently by UT, it is necessary to make the wave length comparable to or smaller than the expected defect size.
Hence, for detection and assessment of smaller defects, it is necessary to use high frequency. The UT data can be displayed in three modes viz. A-scan, B-scan and C-scan. Ultrasonic NDT methods are also widely used for detection and characterisation of defects in plates, castings, forgings, welds, structures etc. A few important areas in ultrasonic testing areSAFTPhased-arraysC-Scan ImagingSpectral AnalysisTOFDEMATsSignal ProcessingTomographyAI / Expert / Knowldege SystemsNon-linear UltrasonicsLaser-based UltrasonicsAttenuation of ultrasonic energy can be used for quantitative evaluation of material properties. Empirical correlations have been obtained between ultrasonic attenuation and the impact strength, fracture toughness, grain size and tensile strength of steels. Similarly, ultrasonic velocity measurements can be used to estimate residual stresses in materials.
This methodology uses shear waves polarised in two mutually perpendicular directions. These waves have slightly different velocities and so interfere, so that as the transducer is rotated, the interference vanishes when the polarising planes are parallel and perpendicular to the stress axis. Once this axis is known, the actual stress can be computed from the velocities. Stress measurements using ultrasonic technique are also dependent on the acousto elastic effect i.e. strain induced ultrasonic wave velocity variations in materials. By precise measurement of ultrasonic velocity, information about stress can be obtained. Using a new method, accuracy of transit time measurements of the order of 0.2 nano second has been achieved.This method has been effectively used for characterisation of microstuctures in a variety of steels.Ultrasonic examination of austenitic stainless steel welds is complicated by beam skewing, distortion, and deflection due to anisotropy and coarse grained microstructure in the weld regions.
One ultrasonic wave mode that is not prone to beam skewing and distorion is shear horizontal (SH) wave. SH waves can be generated only electromagnetic acoustic transducers (EMATs). Phase EMATs capable of generating angle beam SH waves in any angle of incidence are popularly used for NDE of stainless steel welds. Artificial neural network based method has been developed for quantitative characterisation and classification of defects in stainless steel welds.

INTRODUCTION TO MAGNETIC PARTICLE AND FLUX LEAKAGE TESTING

MAGNETIC PARTICLE TESTING (MPT)
Magnetic Particle Testing (MPT) is an NDT method used to detect surface and near surface flaws in ferromagnetic materials such as steel and iron. The technique uses the principle that magnetic lines of force (flux) are distorted by the presence of a flaw in a manner that will reveal it's presence. The flaw (for example, a crack) is located from the "flux leakage", following the application of fine iron particles, to the area under examination. The iron particles can be applied dry or wet; suspended in a liquid and coloured. For the most sensitive applications, Fluorescent coated particles are used, and inspection is carried out under an Ultra Violet light. This enhances the detection even more. For near surface defects, the effectiveness quickly diminishes depending on the flaw depth and type. The image is more sharp if the flaw is closer to the surface. Surface irregularities and scratches can give misleading indications. Therefore, it is necessary to ensure careful preparation of the surface before MPT is undertaken. Defects which are perpendicular to the lines of force are detected efficiently. Magnetisation MethodsFor magnetisation of components, A.C, D.C. and HWDC are used. While AC methods are ideal for detection of shallow surface defects and DC or HWDC methods are preferred for detection of near-surface defects. Different methods of magnetisation are :• Longitudinal magnetisation (coil wrapping over component, detects radial cracks)• Circular magnetisation (passing current through component, detects longitudinal cracks)• Yoke magnetisation (longitudinal magnetisation, adjustable legs, portable)• Prods (Circular magnetisation, inspection of welds, burning/damage of surface)A component is usually magnetised in more than one direction because detection of sensitivity of each method maximum along one direction. Indications of discontinuities are preserved by photography or video recording or by the use of peel off transparent adhesive films. The DetectablesMPT can be used for detection of cracks, blowholes, laps, non-metallic inclusions, and segregation etc. Under optimal conditions, and with very good surfaces, detection of defects of about 0.5mm long can be achieved (depths from about 0.02mm). The sensitivity of MPT depends on the magnetisation method and on the electromagnetic properties of the material tested as well as on the size, shape and orientation of the defect. DemagnetisationDemagnetistion of the component is often specified after MPT to avoid electromagnetic interference, arc deflection, arc blow and other build up of particles. Demagnetisation is carried out by subjecting the component to continuously reversing and reducing magnetic field.Required CareIn MPT, utmost attention is paid for reliable detection of defects due to the underlying fact - a defect detected is almost characterised to the maximum possible extent. In other words, scope does not exist in MPT to apply signal processing methods for enhanced detection and accurate characterisation of defects as practised in ultrasonic, eddy current and other NDT methods. In light of this, magnetisation methods, amperage, powders, carrier fluids, sprinkling methods, viewing conditions and recording methods etc. are carefully tailored such that an existing defect (within the detection limit of the test procedure) does not go undetected. For example, dry powder methods are employed if large discontinuities (>1 mm), especially the sub-surface ones are expected. Red coloured powders are preferred on dark surfaces and black coated powders on hot objects (up to 400° C). On the contrary, to detect small and shallow surface defects such as tight fatigue cracks, wet fluorescent methods with black light illumination are resorted to. The size of powder has to be small in both dry (upto 150 microns) and wet (upto 25 microns) methods to enable detection of smaller discontinuities by easy migration and build up of powder particles.Typical AplicationWet fluorescent MPT method is routinely applied as part of in-service inspection programme of low-pressure (LP) side turbines for detection of fatigue cracks, corrosion damage in rotors and blades.CautionIt is commonly thought that MPT is relatively a simple method and training is usually overlooked. The consequences of such an assumption are missing of harmful defects due to improper magnetisation/demagnetisation, inaccurate calibration of equipment, inadequate illumination, inaccurate particle concentration, and misinterpretation. It is all the more essential to use Gauss meters for measurement of magnetic fields, quality indicators (shims) for controlling the field strength and verifying field direction and more importantly, the Ketos ring for establishing the detection sensitivity.MPT LimitationsOne major limitation of MPT is that only ferromagnetic materials can be tested. Another limitation of MPT is the impossibility to characterise depth and orientation of defects. A large near-surface defect and a shallow surface defect may give identical indications causing uncertainty. To classify such indications into surface and near-surface, other NDT methods such as visual testing are necessary.MAGNETIC FLUX LEAKAGE (MFL) TESTINGIn contrast to MPT, localised magnetic leakage fields are detected in MFL testing using sensors such as inductive coils, Hall elements, magnetometers and magetodiodes. Use of sensors in MFL testing enables automatic testing and quantitative evaluation without human inspectors. The sensor output depends on the size and orientation of the defects as well as on the level of magnetisation and the inspection speed. MFL testing is widely used for inspection of oil storage tank floors and pipes (internal/external), steel wire ropes under water structures and highly irregular components. Unlike in MPT, the magnetisation levels are usually low and high strength rare earth magnets are commonly used for magnetisation. Since magnetisation is local, demagnetisation is usually not required. The amount of leakage flux is dependant on depth, orientation, type and position (topside or bottom-side) of the defect, material permeability and magnetisation level. In general, the MFL unit comprising of magnets and sensors is scanned at uniform speed and the sensor output is recorded continuously. MFL units can be portable, battery-powered, and compact. For inspection of long oil pipelines, which run a few hundreds of kilometres, pipe inspection gauges (PIGs) housing the MFL units are widely employed for detection and evaluation of corrosion damage. Recently one such PIG has been developed at BARC, India for the inspection of oil pipelines. PIGs consist of MFL unit, stand-alone battery supply, data analysis and processing computers and other supporting electronics for acquiring and transmitting data to a remote log station, where evaluation is carried out. MFL method is applicable for inspection of tankfloors involving thickness upto 15 mm. Selection of sensor is important as it decides the success of MFL testing. Though Hall sensors are undeniably more sensitive than inductive coils for measurement of leakage fields, they are too sensitive to surface conditions and this results in an unreliable inspection and the generation of significant false calls. Hence, for example, for the inspection of tubes, the preferred sensor is the traditional humble coil due to stability and reliability.